Showing posts with label Veterans at Risk: Budget Wars 2011. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Veterans at Risk: Budget Wars 2011. Show all posts

Sunday, September 18, 2011

Veterans at Risk: Budget Wars 2011 - Senators concerned VA will be short of resources for veterans' healthcare

Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee Chairwoman Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and ranking member Richard Burr (R-N.C.) sent a letter to Department of Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki on Thursday requesting the agency's budget projections for fiscal 2012 and asking for assurances that they can deliver the needed level of healthcare.

The increase in demand for healthcare, coupled with the lower-than-expected Medical Care Collections Fund (MCCF) collection rate, along with recent reports regarding staffing reductions and emergency budget cuts at certain medical centers, has raised concerns about funding and "underscores the critical need to ensure resources are being maximized" and spending requests accurately estimated, they said.

The Source

Friday, September 9, 2011

Veterans at Risk: Budget Wars 2011: NEW COMMANDER CALLS CUTS IN BENEFITS "UNCONSCIONABLE"


“We fully understand the difficult fiscal decisions our nation must make,” acknowledged newly elected Commander-in-Chief, Richard L. DeNoyer, in his acceptance speech. “But the programs and benefits veterans and military families have earned and deserve have already been paid for through their honorable service and sacrifice.”

“Regrettably, even though our all-volunteer military has shouldered a multi-theater war all by themselves for almost 10 years, even as we meet some in Congress have proposed plans that would leave America’s military and her veterans to shoulder more of the national debt,” he said.
The Source

Thursday, September 8, 2011

Bachmann Pledges To Defend Veterans Benefits After Proposing To Cut Them By $4.5 Billion In January


When it comes to caring for our nation’s veterans, Republican presidential candidate Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) has undergone an astonishing transformation in the last nine months.
In January, she proposed a wildly unpopular plan to slash $4.5 billion in veterans services and reduce disability compensation for 150,000 veterans.
Veterans groups blasted the proposal as “heartless,” “totally out of step with America’s commitment to our veterans,” and “showing contempt for American servicemembers’ sacrifices.” Facing an avalanche of criticism, Bachmann eventually withdrew her proposal.

But now that she’s running for president, Bachmann is billing herself as a great defender of veterans benefits.
The congresswoman offered no explanation for her sharp reversal on the issue, but it’s hard to interpret her promise to strengthen veterans benefits nine months after trying to cut them as anything other than empty pandering to an important political constituency.

The Source

Monday, September 5, 2011

Veterans at Risk: Veterans funding an Obama priority


President Barack Obama brought cheers from thousands of American Legionnaires when he promised: “The federal budget will not be balanced on the backs of veterans.”

The Source

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Veterans at Risk: Budget Wars 2011 - Veterans groups preparing for budget fight


After 10 years of war and expanded benefits for those who fought, veterans groups now are girding to battle against takeaways, as Congress considers sweeping budget cuts over the next four months.

A congressional “super committee” created by the Aug. 2 debt-ceiling legislation has until Thanksgiving to recommend ways to trim $1.2 trillion from the federal budget over a decade.

Veterans groups warn that health care and disability benefits are particularly vulnerable.

“I think health care is on everyone’s radar screen. That’s probably my biggest concern. That they are going to try to find ways to cut that funding,” said Joseph Violante, national legislative director for the Disabled American Veterans.

“Our point is that the sacrifices already made by those who serve are so much greater than the average citizen. We should come to them last.”

Veterans groups see these things as possible:

• The introduction of $500 annual enrollment fees or increased co-payments for 1.3 million veterans in the VA medical system who don’t have a military-related injury. Advocates say these patients support the larger system through the co-payments that they provide and funds that the VA recoups from their private insurance plans. The VA also could bar them from the health care system altogether.

• Changing how annual cost-of-living increases are calculated. The American Legion estimates this move would lop .25 percent a year off a veteran’s disability checks. The government’s saving over 10 years would be $140 billion.

• Taxing disability checks. Or, cutting disability pay for those whose income is too high.

The VFW’s longer, 10-item list is partly based on the “Back in Black” austerity proposal that Republican Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma released in July.

It called for increasing Tricare fees and consolidating taxpayer-supported grocery and retail stores that offer below-market prices to troops and military retirees. It also suggested ending tuition reimbursement for troops and closing Defense Department public schools on U.S. bases.

Coburn’s plan didn’t gain traction in Congress, nor did his later proposal to limit VA “presumptives,” which allow the VA to presume that some disabilities were caused by acknowledged health threats, such as Agent Orange during the Vietnam War. Without those, veterans would have a harder time proving their medical problems were caused by military service.

Still, the VFW’s legislative director said Coburn’s ideas live on in Washington, D.C.

“Every piece of that is still up for grabs,” Kelley said.
The Source